I found an article " Globalization "published on 25/1/2001 that ends well:
" It 's territory the center toward which bring together a significant part of the interests of the community, "new subjectual working in a factory in widespread social territorial system, movements from below. is reasonable to remember that after the war three great teachers and leaders of Italian syndicalism, Di Vittorio, Buozzi or large, had questions intuition is the light of industrial and agricultural then, both in the light of the proven risks of corporatism . And by drawing on the unique historical memory of the Italian reform launched and organized throughout the Italian Chambers of Labour, as key locations for bring together different categories and mediate different interests. Even the European mode was the particular conception of the CISL trade union to bring to demobilize almost without fight - only the memory card streenua opposizionbe Rinaldo - qusto decisive institution. This is not to resume today for this or that body power, but certainly it is to create regional offices spread where it can develop that social policy, from the bottom up, without which we will only follow leaders without referenced by economic groups and financial lobbies or restricted.
Then and only then the intervention of the various joints of the state, I do not see necessarily in opposition to the market, Adam Smith, may also play a positive role in Europe that take new steps towards a real union. "
It seems to me that they have said, perhaps, unnecessary things. And I say now when the parties hardly exist and there is no democracy, perceived as such.
